Here's a preview of a larger project that's in the works. I plan on bashing my way through Bowen's Reaction Series, but I thought I'd post one of the shots to get some feedback. Mainly, is the depth of field sufficient? I'm limited in how small I can make the camera's aperture and still get decent results, so I can't get more depth of field without buying more lights. And the pair of 500W tungsten lights I'm using right now are really, really hot. Like over 200°C near the bulb hot.
So, in what what will become a more "continuous" series (heh) of clips for the silicate minerals:
I'm not sure I like the hammer used in this shot - the 3lb sledge was too heavy to quickly pull away, so it kind of dominates the scene and covers up the mineral, so I adjusted the playback speed in a few places to minimize the time the hammer occupies the frame. The well-developed single plane cleavage of muscovite presented some additional challenges. In order to produce deformation (separation along that cleavage plane), I needed the direction of maximum stress (the hammer blow) to be perpendicular to the cleavage plane. I was worried that a smaller hammer would simply slip off or something and leave me without much visible deformation. But this kind of hammer wouldn't produce good results with smaller, more brittle samples.
If you aren't moving at a snail's pace, you aren't moving at all. -Iris Murdoch
Showing posts with label mineral mashing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mineral mashing. Show all posts
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Moar Mineral Mashing: Calcite
Okay, let's try something that shows cleavage in some non-orthogonal orientations. Calcite is a good one:
Mineral Mashing: Galena
This one turned out pretty nicely. I shot it at 10,000 frames per second, so the resolution is a little reduced. But the tendency of galena to break into tiny cubic cleavage fragments is pretty clear. And I just love the glitter effect, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)